Is a state law that prohibits housing discrimination based on political affiliation an example of an antidiscrimination law?

A state law that prohibits housing discrimination based on political affiliation is indeed an example of an antidiscrimination law. This is because state laws have the authority to establish additional protected classes beyond those defined by federal law. While federal laws, such as the Fair Housing Act, provide a baseline for protected characteristics in housing contexts, states can expand upon these protections to address local concerns and promote equality in housing opportunities.

By including political affiliation as a protected class, the state acknowledges the importance of preventing discrimination based on an individual's political beliefs, thereby enhancing the overall framework of civil rights and ensuring that all individuals, irrespective of their political views, have fair access to housing. This reflects a broader commitment to combating discrimination in all its forms at the state level.

In contrast to this, other choices may suggest limitations that are not inherent in the law. Federal laws do establish a core set of protections, but they do not preclude state governments from enacting their own laws that add layers of protection, thus reinforcing the idea that state antidiscrimination laws can operate concurrently with federal laws.